Comments on: Gamemaker Magazine, pt. 2 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/ Gamemaker news, comment, discussion, opinion and community news Mon, 21 May 2012 01:33:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Which way to go? » GameMaker Blog http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14535 Which way to go? » GameMaker Blog Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:11:34 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-14535 [...] with its first two issues, but I feel my input here would make the most difference. Despite the shaky start I see potential in the magazine and I truly believe that come a few months it could be the main [...] [...] with its first two issues, but I feel my input here would make the most difference. Despite the shaky start I see potential in the magazine and I truly believe that come a few months it could be the main [...]

]]> By: Leif902 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6658 Leif902 Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:45:54 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6658 Wow... heated debate. I vote MarkUp! Wow… heated debate. I vote MarkUp!

]]> By: Robin Monks http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6623 Robin Monks Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:34:22 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6623 How narrow a vision...anyways. Onward to GMTV3. Robin How narrow a vision…anyways.

Onward to GMTV3.

Robin

]]> By: Phil Gamble http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6614 Phil Gamble Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:52:26 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6614 Peace. Please. Peace. Please.

]]> By: tuntis http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6610 tuntis Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:08:04 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6610 ok here we go <i>Yes, obviously MarkUp, </i>with it's quality writers, more professional attitude and well proofreaded articles has to be much worse than GMTech, with it's unprofessional writing, and retarded writers picked off the street! and there's my opinion :D ok here we go

Yes, obviously MarkUp, with it’s quality writers, more professional attitude and well proofreaded articles has to be much worse than GMTech, with it’s unprofessional writing, and retarded writers picked off the street!

and there’s my opinion :D

]]> By: gamez93 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6609 gamez93 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:23:06 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6609 That my friend isn't 'cheap' its probably true. Stop bothering GMTech with comments everytime and start working on your own issues. Remember these are my own opinions, just like you have the right to post about the Wiki, I have the right to post that - this site is for ' Gamemaker news, comment, discussion, opinion, community news and downloads' right? That my friend isn’t ‘cheap’ its probably true. Stop bothering GMTech with comments everytime and start working on your own issues.

Remember these are my own opinions, just like you have the right to post about the Wiki, I have the right to post that – this site is for ‘
Gamemaker news, comment, discussion, opinion, community news and downloads’ right?

]]> By: tuntis http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6608 tuntis Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:03:56 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6608 That was cheap. <i>I'm not even going to comment.</i> That was cheap. I’m not even going to comment.

]]> By: gamez93 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6606 gamez93 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:13:15 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6606 One of the problems is that a lot of the people who work on MU seems to think their magazine is the best GM magazine ever and they can poke at everyone else. The problem is that you have got it all wrong it's nowhere near as good as GMTech, and you all know it deep inside. Rather than trying to release the most issues a year - worry about release good quality issues as GMTech always does. Also Robin, what content ideas were stolen from MU? One of the problems is that a lot of the people who work on MU seems to think their magazine is the best GM magazine ever and they can poke at everyone else. The problem is that you have got it all wrong it’s nowhere near as good as GMTech, and you all know it deep inside.

Rather than trying to release the most issues a year – worry about release good quality issues as GMTech always does.

Also Robin, what content ideas were stolen from MU?

]]> By: gmjab http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6599 gmjab Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:41:35 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6599 I know he was poking but I'm sick of people saying designs/ideas have been stolen when it hasn't. I know he was poking but I’m sick of people saying designs/ideas have been stolen when it hasn’t.

]]> By: tuntis http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6596 tuntis Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:43:10 +0000 http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/03/18/gamemaker-magazine-pt-2/#comment-6596 Wow gmjab, you sure know how to take <b>everything</b> seriously. <i>Defiantly</i> you know Robin was just doing a slight "poke" at you: no need to get pissed! Wow gmjab, you sure know how to take everything seriously. Defiantly you know Robin was just doing a slight “poke” at you: no need to get pissed!

]]>