<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMTV episode 4: detailed analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/</link>
	<description>Gamemaker news, comment, discussion, opinion and community news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GMKing and GMTV to part company &#187; GameMaker Blog</title>
		<link>http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-37394</link>
		<dc:creator>GMKing and GMTV to part company &#187; GameMaker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/#comment-37394</guid>
		<description>[...] GMTV joined the GMKing network, announced shortly after the release of GMTV episode 4 in July last year, the move was controversial especially with those at GMTech.  Only one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding-left: 20px;">
<p>[...] GMTV joined the GMKing network, announced shortly after the release of GMTV episode 4 in July last year, the move was controversial especially with those at GMTech.  Only one [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAL</title>
		<link>http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-11652</link>
		<dc:creator>NAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/#comment-11652</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving the new look, but there&#039;s a few errors in content and pronounciation. Otherwise, it&#039;s pretty good. Best so far.

Oh, and R2S9 is better than Ad Nauseam 2. But that&#039;s my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loving the new look, but there&#8217;s a few errors in content and pronounciation. Otherwise, it&#8217;s pretty good. Best so far.</p>
<p>Oh, and R2S9 is better than Ad Nauseam 2. But that&#8217;s my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyas Sharaiha</title>
		<link>http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-11635</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyas Sharaiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamemakerblog.com/2008/07/24/gmtv-episode-4-detailed-analysis/#comment-11635</guid>
		<description>Most professional to date indeed. I still wouldn&#039;t mind more professionalism personally, but its definitely getting there. Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most professional to date indeed. I still wouldn&#8217;t mind more professionalism personally, but its definitely getting there. Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
