Comments on: Game Maker Tech Issue 16 Released

By: Bas Bloem

Bas Bloem — Sat, 30 May 2009 12:02:46 +0000

Pretty good
I like the style

By: gamez93

gamez93 — Sat, 30 May 2009 11:31:17 +0000

@SunnyKatt Surely articles that provide some insight into improving your game creations by working on cut scenes, creating a more engaging game by developing your game in such a way that the player feels like they are the character are just as good, if not better than reviews of games that are completed. Not only that, but reviews are pretty simple in the case that you are just reporting on the game, whereas the features require research and understanding of the chosen subject. It would have been a lot easier to have 6 pages of reviews, than get these detailed pieces that developers can read and apply the techniques to their own game. That is how I see it, but thanks for providing some in depth comments on the issue as a whole. Please continue to do this as it allows us to further improve. @James Rhodes Thanks, the main design of the page layout was down to Tim and he further improved it this issue. I worked on adding backgrounds that relating to the pages as well as working on putting together the front cover. It is a team effort to try and get the issue looking as good as possible. @scoz If you want to write, whether it is as part of the team or just doing some freelance work then just email me or post on the GMTech forum. We are always happy to hear from people interested and then we can discuss the best way to go about getting your content in the issue. Thanks for your positive comments, please keep them coming. As for the link in Phil's blog, that was my fault, I was meant to change it however I was too busy replying to emails. So, sorry about that.

By: Game Maker in Schools » GameMaker Blog

Game Maker in Schools » GameMaker Blog — Sat, 30 May 2009 11:27:01 +0000

[...] article was first published in Game Maker Tech issue 16 released on 29th May [...]

By: Philip Gamble

Philip Gamble — Sat, 30 May 2009 10:48:57 +0000

@Broxter, @NAL Thanks, fixed. I thought Kay had done this earlier.

By: NAL

NAL — Sat, 30 May 2009 10:32:51 +0000

Quick error note – the link to Another Day In The Life Of Bob leads to its predecessor, A Day In The Life Of Bob. Correct link: http://www.yoyogames.com/games/show/72697

Ignoring my contribution, I enjoyed the magazine as a whole, but was very surprised to see Innoquous 2 as a hidden gem. There are so many better games out there!

By: scoz

scoz — Sat, 30 May 2009 10:25:03 +0000

Yep. Mmmhhmmmm, that was as good as I was expecting, if not better. *Sigh* I already write for three things, a fourth might do me in but…. it would be awesome to write for GMTech.

BTW, I had a take home exam to do today, the temptation to let it slide and read this was almost unbearable. I have another paper to write tommorow. If kwiklook or markup come out tommorow it could very well spell fail on my uni grades

By: Broxter

Broxter — Sat, 30 May 2009 09:12:51 +0000

It turned out better than I expected.
By the way Phil, you’ve linked to the original Bob game, not the sequel.

By: James Rhodes

James Rhodes — Sat, 30 May 2009 04:28:16 +0000

I absolutely love the magazine design. It makes it all that more professional.

By: SunnyKatt

SunnyKatt — Sat, 30 May 2009 00:20:53 +0000

I think I’d rather the magazine have many more reviews rather than a bunch of theoretical articles. I think they’re just fluffing the magazine up without adding content that I find worthwhile info.

That’s my opinion, mind.

Otherwise, it’s looking nice.

By: Giorgio

Giorgio — Fri, 29 May 2009 18:46:26 +0000

That’s a very refreshing issue. It has a pro look and good selection about the cover, fits with the summer period. I can say it’s contents are clear and not frustrating to read them, they keep you interested to read them. As a reader, I would like more tutorials in the future, based more of how to start make games more efficiently.