Adware can lose game creators money

on August 8, 2008 - 2657 Views

Bad implementation of adware can be counterproductive.

Introducing the free version of Chara-Maker v3 a promising piece of software which, through the use of a freely available sprite sheet, makes creating simple characters easy. Only one character is present but they are animated through a large variety of actions and hair styles and all colour areas of the character can easily be customised. Coloured sprite sheets can then be exported or even saved as animated .gifs to make using them in your game pain free. All in all it is a very useful program. Until that is, you use it.

The program has two small advertising banners built into the main screen – fair enough. But every 3 minutes a Commission Junction affiliate link is launched in a IE window. The adverts don’t make the program totally unusable – but they do destroy the image of a high-quality product.

Nowhere can I find something listing the differences between the free version and the $16 one on the probably-soon-to-close PCGamesNow. So I assume that the only difference is the lack of ads – if so, $16 is a ridiculous figure. The ads certainly aren’t generating 16 dollars per user. As someone who is crap at spriting I would happily pay for the full version of this software if it contained additional features and was at a more reasonable price. The over-use of adware tainted my experience of Chara-Maker 3 and in combination with the high ad-free pricing means I will not be supporting this program.

See also: Going Commercial article for MarkUp 7 which takes a look at different ways game creators can earn money from their projects – including the benefits and disadvantages of using adware and an interview with Natso whose adware supported game was downloaded more than 24,000 times.

Recent Posts

7 Responses to Adware can lose game creators money

  1. Sim says:

    nice sprite =)

  2. “But every 3 minutes a Commission Junction affiliate link is launched in a IE window” that part is one of the major turn off for the sprite maker. And I agree the quality of the sprite isn’t too good looking.

  3. Phil Gamble says:

    Blijbol – The over-use of adverts in the free version is losing the creators support and therefore potential revenue. In combination with the high price for an ad-free version I don’t see this project generating any revenues.

  4. MSR says:

    That’s a really crappy-looking sprite too. I can’t believe they think that thing is worth $16

  5. Blijbol says:

    The article itself is quite clear, but the title needs some further explanation. Why would it cost the game/program developer any money?

  6. NAL says:

    Oh wait, no it’s not. Forget that.

  7. NAL says:

    He’s since released the full version (not worth paying for at all) to the GMC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *